{"id":10248,"date":"2014-05-21T09:37:00","date_gmt":"2014-05-21T09:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/circutorweb.atic.blue\/?p=120"},"modified":"2014-05-21T09:37:00","modified_gmt":"2014-05-21T09:37:00","slug":"capacitor-bank-selection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/circutor.com\/en\/articulos\/capacitor-bank-selection\/","title":{"rendered":"Capacitor bank selection"},"content":{"rendered":"

When the cheapest solution turns out to be the most expensive<\/h2>\n

Any technician with minimum electrical knowledge can determine or calculate reactive power compensation. The most common practice is using \u201ca single\u201d electricity bill. The emphasis here is on the \u201csingle\u201d electricity bill as it is precisely here that a series of errors can start, which can often end up, with higher costs than those involved when a capacitor bank is correctly determined.
The calculation of the reactive power to be compensated using electricity bills provides us with a relatively correct approximation about which order of magnitude we are dealing with; our starting point. In these cases it is important to ensure that these calculations are carried out with the maximum number of invoices, as they may be heavily influenced by seasonality that we may have ignored (Example: offices or hotels with totally different consumptions in summer than in winter).
As we have mentioned before this must be our starting point, but we must bear in mind other factors which are not reflected in the electricity bill, and are of vital importance for correct compensation:<\/p>\n